Konstrukt vs UI-O-Matic

Differences between Konstrukt and UI-O-Matic, the back office UI builders for Umbraco.

For anyone familiar with Umbraco you may already know of the open source back office UI builder, UI-O-Matic and be wondering why you should choose Kostrukt instead. To help with that decision, we've put together the following feature matrix to compare some of their major differences.

API

FeatureKonstruktUI-O-Matic

Style

Fluent API

Attribute based API

Strongly Typed

Yes

No

Seperation of Concerns

Yes - Config is seperate to poco models

No - Config is combined with the poco models

Manage 3rd Party Models

Yes - As config is seperate to poco models, Konstrukt can manage any poco models

No - As config is attribute based, you need to have full control of poco models to add attributes to

Configuration Context

Config is always in the context of the poco model with Konstrukt automatically converting between properties and DB columns

Config switches between poco model properties and DB columns so can be confusing if you aren't aware of the context

Supports Dependency Injection

Yes - Where types are passed to the API, the service provider is used to resolve those types allowing for dependency injection of depdendencies

No

Features

FeatureKonstruktUI-O-Matic

Dashboards

Yes

No

Context Apps

Yes

Ish - There is an API to define context apps, but it's just a shortcut for Umbraco's Content Apps API, so doesn't support associating a collection with the context app

Sections

Yes

Yes - Requies custom tree controller

Section Dashboard

Yes

Yes

Cards

Yes

No

List View Filters

Yes - Data Views and Property Filters

Yes - Dropdown filter only

List View Field Views

Yes

Yes

Field Editors

Konstrukt re-uses Umbraco property editors and so can use the full suite of core and community property editors

Limited to a set of UI-O-Matic provided editors

Editor Organisation Structures

Tabs + Fieldsets

Tabs

Editor Validation

Yes

Yes

Menu Actions

Yes - C# based

Yes - JS based

Bulk Actions

Yes - C# based

No

Row Actions

Yes - C# based

No

Virtual Sub Trees

Yes

No

Custom Trees in Existing Sections

Yes

No

Encrypted Properties

Yes

No

Value Mappers

Yes

No

Child Collections

Yes

Yes - Requires a convoluted config of hidden collections + list view properties on the parent poco model

Custom Repositories

Yes

Yes

Events

CRUD + Query + Startup events

CRUD + Query events

Data Export

Export Bulk/Row action available OOTB

Via 3rd party add-on

Property Editors

Entity Picker

Dropdown + Multi Picker

Localized

No

Yes

Supported Umbraco Versions

v10+

v7+

License

FeatureKonstruktUI-O-Matic

Open Source

No

Yes

Can be used on Umbraco Cloud

Yes

No

Fee

Free for one collection, then £450 exc VAT per install

Free unless you are a paid Umbraco Partner then you are required to negotiate a fee or face a $15,000+ penalty

Support

FeatureKonstruktUI-O-Matic

Supported by

Outfield Digital Ltd + Community

Community

Our Umbraco Forum

Yes

No

Email Support

Yes - Commercial

Yes - Personal

Issue Tracker

Yes

Yes

Documentation

Yes

Yes

Last updated